Archive for 2018

Saturday, June 11, 2005

A House subcommittee voted Thursday to sharply reduce the federal government’s financial spending for Fiscal Year ’06, including eliminating taxpayer funds that help produce such shows as Sesame Street and Arthur.

The spending cutbacks far exceeded even those requested by the White House. Among initiatives slated for reduction are $39 million for conversion to digital programming and $50 million for upgrading PBS’s aging satellite technology.

The subcommittee also acted to eliminate federal money for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a body created by Congress to pass funds on to public broadcasters. The CPB would see a 25 percent reduction in next year’s budget, down from $400 million to $300 million, funds that currently account for 14.9% of all public broadcasting revenues[1].

Ideological concerns over publicly-financed content have recently become a point of contention for the Republican-controlled CPB. The day after the new budget was approved, CNN obtained an internal memo by NPR’s executive vice president Ken Stern that blamed the cuts on “recent public turbulence caused by CPB chairman Ken Tomlinson’s irresponsible attacks on public broadcasting.” Stern’s memo also told staffers the cut would not hurt NPR directly because it receives little direct support from the CPB. Instead, he emphasized, smaller local stations that rely upon federal dollars are most likely to be affected, which could in turn take a bite out of regular dues and fees, NPR’s largest revenue source.

Under the budget, the Ready to Learn program’s $23 million appropriation for children’s shows is rescinded in its entirety. John Lawson, president of the Association of Public Television Stations, said the cut was retribution for an episode of “Postcards From Buster” featuring a pair of lesbian parents from Vermont. A spokesman for the Appropriations Committee, John Scofield, denied the claim.

“Ready to Learn was one of more than 50 programs terminated in the spending bill,” he told the New York Times. “It might be a nice program to do, but not in a flat budget with large budget deficits. We felt the same way about 49 other programs.”

Overall, the cuts would signal the most dramatic cutback of public broadcasting since Congress created the CPB in 1967. The spending bill is expected to pass the Appropriations Committee and the House, but final legislation will be negotiated with the Senate.

Canon LEGRIA FS22 v/s Panasonic HDC-HS20 Digital Camcorder

by

Charles DIckens

There is an immense range of camcorders available on the market. It literally is a problem of plenty rather than a problem of not getting a camcorder of your choice. Canon and Panasonic digital camcorders are some of the better choices available out there.

Here s a comparison between the Canon LEGRIA FS22 v/s Panasonic-HS20

The User Friendly Aspect

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfrU4uXRSvE[/youtube]

All camcorders today, are compact and user-friendly. So, you can t really choose between the two on this one aspect. Both are high definition camcorders and offer HD treatment of a superior quality. You can select your levels of image quality easily and conveniently.

Hard Drive and Optical Sensor

With its 80 GB hard drive the Panasonic HDC-HS 20 scores over the 32 GB internal Flash drive of the LEGRIA FS22. There is also a difference in the type of optical sensors that both camcorders use. While the HS20 uses a CMOS optical sensor, Canon uses a CCD sensor. Traditionally CMOS sensors are more susceptible to noise. But, they do consume less power than a CCD sensor. When you buy digital camcorder online it s important that you know which sensor you are going for. It will help you gauge the picture quality of your camera and also the power consumption.

Other specifications

The LCD screen size of both these digital camcorders is the same 2.7 inches. Here there is nothing to choose between the two. On the other hand there is a dramatic difference when it comes to the sensor resolution. While the Panasonic HDC-HS20 offers a resolution of 11.7 mega pixels, the Canon LEGRIA FS 22 offers a sensor of resolution of 1.1 mega pixels. When it comes to the optical zoom, the LEGRIA FS22 offers a 45x optical zoom, while Panasonic HDC-HS20 offers a 16x zoom lens. There is a difference in their LCD screens as this range of Panasonic Digital camcorders offers a touch screen LCD while the Canon camcorder offers a flip-out LCD.

Choosing between the two

As far as the weight is concerned the Panasonic HDC-HS20 is 360g, while the Canon LEGRIA-FS 22 is 230 g. When you buy digital camcorder online, it s important to go through the specifications with a fine tooth comb to understand the difference between the various cameras that you are looking at. But, more importantly you must also understand the significance of these specifications. Only then can you make the right choice. When it comes to the two cameras that we have compared, there is very little to choose from between the two. It s what you want from your camcorder that s going to help you make a decision.

Charles Dickens is authoring for ElectronicBazaar.com.au, in an attempt to provide a comprehensive range of Mobile Phone & Accessories like

Panasonic digital camcorders

,and more like Earphone, Mobile Phone etc to the consumers. You can

buy digital camcorder online

including a huge range of Nokia Latest Released Mobile Phones at our Website.

Article Source:

Canon LEGRIA FS22 v/s Panasonic HDC-HS20 Digital Camcorder

Monday, December 26, 2005According to the Scotsman newspaper, the directors of the 2012 London Olympics have insisted that the city won the right to host the games “fairly and squarely” after claims were touted by an Israeli official that a “potentially decisive vote was cast in error by an International Olympic Committee (IOC) official”

The Israeli official, Alex Gilady, claims that in the third round of voting, Greek delegate Lambis Nikolaou may have accidentally voted for Paris rather than Madrid, resulting in eliminating Madrid rather than Paris from the final round.

London spokesmen and bid leaders have dismissed the claims as “folklore stories”, “totally irrelevant” and “tittle-tattle”, while the CEO of the Madrid bid told the London Times, “We were very close to winning. We can never know if the Greek vote would have been decisive, but it is lamentable for one human error to have ruined all our hard work.”

Thursday, January 12, 2017

United States President Barack Obama gave his official farewell address on Tuesday night from McCormick Place in Chicago, reflecting on personal and national accomplishments. This is expected to be his last major speech before officially handing the reins to president-elect Donald Trump on January 20.

“Its why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima; Iraq and Afghanistan – and why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were prepared to give theirs as well.”

Obama’s speech was wide-ranging. He thanked his family and the nation, spoke of the need for unity, noted the country’s accomplishments and need for improvement in areas like education and civil rights, and spoke about the need for pride in U.S. accomplishments, citing milestones of U.S. history and of his presidency specifically. “It’s why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima; Iraq and Afghanistan – and why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were prepared to give theirs as well.”

The president also addressed his country’s troubled history with race and racism, an issue many black citizens feel he has avoided. Despite this, Chauncy Devega of Salon described the president as “a role model of calm, cool reflective black masculinity: a man utterly at home in his own skin.” Obama described the concept of a post-racial U.S. “unrealistic” and particularly cited the need for reform in education and the criminal justice system and greater acceptance of scientific evidence, particularly evidence supporting action to counteract climate change.

However, publications including The Washington Post and Salon have given particular focus to another aspect of the president’s address: the country’s increasing political tensions and controversies involving access to news and information, both accurate and inaccurate. “We become so secure and our bubbles,” said Obama, “that we start accepting only information, whether it’s true or not, that fits our opinions instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that is out there,” calling this trend “a third threat to our democracy.”

The Washington Post characterized Obama’s comment, “If every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hard-working white middle class and an undeserving minority, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves,” as a “not-so-subtle jab” at the campaign tactics of President-elect Donald Trump. The Telegraph describes Obama’s warnings about the need to protect democracy as “a thinly veiled slight to the divisive rhetoric of Donald Trump’s election campaign, which included attacks on Muslims, the disabled, women and immigrants.” The president went on to call on the public to “reject the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties that make us one America. We weaken those ties when we allow our political dialogue to become so corrosive […] We weaken those ties when we define some of us as more American than others when we write off the whole system as inevitably corrupt and when we sit back and blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them. It falls to each of us to be those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy.”

Despite this, when the mention of Donald Trump brought boos from the crowd, Obama reiterated the importance of the long history of peaceful transfers of power from one president to the next: “No no no no no. […] I committed to President-elect Trump that my administration would ensure the smoothest possible transition, just as President Bush did for me.” However, this was not unaccompanied by a call to action. Near the end of the speech, he insisted citizens dissatisfied with elected officials should “lace up your shoes, grab a clipboard, get some signatures and run for office yourself.”

Overall, the departing president’s speech focused on accomplishment, echoing the “Yes we can” slogan from his 2008 campaign: “If I have told you eight years ago, that America would reverse a great recession, reboot our auto industry, and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in our history. If I had told you, that we would open up a new chapter with the Cuban people, shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons program without firing a shot, take out the mastermind of 9/11[…] If I had told you that we would win a marriage equality and secure the right to health insurance for another twenty million of our fellow citizens. If I had told you all that, you might have said our sights were set a little too high. But that’s what we did.”

But when the crowd began shouting “Four more years! Four more years!” Obama, with a small laugh, answered, “I can’t do that.”

Telephone network access on iPhone unlocked by teen

Posted by: in Uncategorized
18
May

Friday, August 24, 2007

George Hotz, 17, confirmed on Friday that he has cracked the lock that joins the Apple iPhone to AT&T‘s wireless network and was using it on T-Mobile‘s network—the only other major U.S. carrier compatible with iPhone technology. This crack opens up the phone, which is only being sold in the U.S., to use on overseas networks. “That’s the big thing,” said Hotz.

Hotz posted the complicated hack, which requires skill with both soldering and software and takes about two hours to perform, to his blog Thursday. He collaborated over the Internet with four other people, including two Russians, to develop the unlocking process that leaves all iPhone functions intact, with the exception of the “visual voicemail” feature.

With the hack available to the public, there is the possibility that some will buy U.S. iPhones, unlock them and send them overseas for profit. “That’s exactly […] what I don’t want,” Hotz said. “I don’t want people making money off this.”

Hotz said he wished he could have made the instructions so that users could modify the phones themselves. “But that’s the simplest I could make them.”

AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel said the company has “no comment” and referred questions to Apple.

A second phone, which was also hacked by Hotz, was placed for sale on eBay. He states at the auction site “Soon, you will be able to buy unlocked iPhones everywhere, in fact probably before this auction ends. But this is the one that started it all. The one unlocked while the steps were posted live on the blog. This isn’t just an unlocked iPhone, this is a piece of history.” Starting at $540, bids reached $99,999,999, although many bids were canceled as fraudulent. Before their removal, Hotz commented on the excessive bids, stating “I’m sure these most recent bids are fake.” The auction was canceled early by Hotz due to “an error in the listing”.

Building collapses in Manhattan

Posted by: in Uncategorized
17
May

Monday, July 10, 2006

New York City —A four-story building on 62nd Street in Manhattan collapsed after an explosion Monday. Both the White House and New York Fire Department have said the explosion was not caused by a terrorist attack. The New York Fire Department said that the owner of the building, Dr. Nicholas Bartha, might have deliberately caused the explosion in a suicide attempt after a difficult divorce.

Wikipedia has more about this subject:

According to the latest reports, five people were injured by the blast, one of whom was hospitalised in critical condition. An additional ten firefighters were injured in the following rescue operation. No deaths have been reported.

Most sources give the cause as a natural gas leak that ignited; a ConEd spokesperson said that someone had reported a gas leak to them about one and a half hours before the explosion took place. The resulting fire, which began in the basement, burned strongly for some time, but was later brought under control by firefighters.

Numerous people described the shockwave from the blast as being similar to an earthquake.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Voters in California, Florida and Arizona voted on Tuesday to ban gay marriage, bringing about a victory for conservatives on a day which did not bring many conservative wins.

Meanwhile, voters in Colorado, South Dakota and California voted on measures which would have restricted abortion in those states. In Massachusetts and Michigan, voters passed measures that loosen marijuana laws. Finally, in the state of Washington a measure was passed that allows physician-assisted suicide.

The California ballot measure, Proposition 8, overturns the recent June ruling by the California State Supreme Court in the case In re Marriage Cases which reversed a 1977 statute passed by the California State Legislature and a 2000 ballot measure, Proposition 22, which also banned same-sex marriage by defining marriage as between a man and a woman. The wording of Proposition 8 is identical to Proposition 22. It was noted that many of the African-Americans and Latinos who cast their votes for Obama, also voted for the measure. The measure passed at 52% to 48%.

Lesbian comedian Ellen DeGeneres noted, “This morning, when it was clear that Proposition 8 had passed in California, I can’t explain the feeling I had. I was saddened beyond belief. Here we just had a giant step toward equality and then on the very next day, we took a giant step away.”

Okay, so I am taking that to mean I do not have to pay my state taxes because I am not a full citizen.

Singer Melissa Etheridge, who is also a lesbian, stated that she would no longer pay taxes due to the passing of Proposition 8, announcing in a blog post, “Okay, so I am taking that to mean I do not have to pay my state taxes because I am not a full citizen.”

Also in California, voters rejected a measure which would require parental notification for a minor to receive an abortion. The measure was rejected with the same percentage as Proposition 8, 52% to 48%. Meanwhile in Colorado, voters rejected a measure that would define life as beginning at conception. While the measure did not specifically mention abortion it would have required legislators and courts to confront legal rights for fetuses – effectively preventing abortion. The measure was defeated in a wide margin, 73% to 27%

In South Dakota, voters also defeated an anti-abortion measure which would have outlawed abortion in all cases except in the case of rape, incest or if the mother’s health was in serious question. If passed, the law would most likely have been challenged as unconstitutional.

In Michigan, voters approved a measure which legalizes medical marijuana. Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, voters approved a ballot question that decriminalizes possession of small amounts of marijuana in which the possession of an ounce or less would be punishable by a $100 fine. The measure will also require minors under the age 18 to participate in and complete a drug awareness program and do community service. Failure to do so, would net the minor a $1,000 fine.

“Tonight’s results represent a sea change. Voters have spectacularly rejected eight years of the most intense government war on marijuana since the days of ‘Reefer Madness,'” said Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project. “The people were ahead of the politicians on this issue; they recognize and want a more sensible approach to our marijuana policy,” said Whitney Taylor, the chair of Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, which backed the Massachusetts proposition.

Also, in Massachusetts, voters overwhelmingly, in every single Massachusetts city and town, rejected a ballot measure which would have eliminated the state income tax by 2010, the ballot measure was sponsored by the Committee for Small Government, which is headed up by two libertarians, Michael Cloud, a Libertarian Party candidate for U.S. Senate in 2002 and Carla Howell, Libertarian Party candidate for governor in the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election.

The last time the income tax elimination measure was on the ballot was in 2002, where it was defeated, narrowly by 45.3%. This stunned supporters of the income tax, who mounted a fierce campaign against the measure this time warning Massachusetts residents that repealing the income tax would have drastic effects on the state’s finances, leading to cuts in services, education and local aid.

Finally, voters passed a question which bans dog racing in Massachusetts, which will lead to the closure of Massachusetts’ two greyhound racing tracks, Raynham-Taunton Greyhound Park and Wonderland Greyhound Park.

The campaign against dog racing was headed up by the Committee to Protect Dogs and endorsed by GREY2K USA and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals along with other animal protection organizations who claimed that dog racing was inhumane as the dogs were stuffed into cramped cages and endured injuries. The measure was opposed by the park owners including George Carney who owns the Rayham-Taunton park and Charles Sarkis, a restaurateur who owns Wonderland.

“We did it. We did it for the dogs,” said Carey Thiel, executive director of GREY2K USA. “For 75 years, greyhounds in our state have endured terrible confinement and suffered serious injuries. We’re better than that,” Thiel added.

One campaign supporter, Sandy Bigelow noted, “It means everything. We’ve worked so hard for the dogs and they heard us. It feels so good. Oh, God, it feels so good.”

George Carney said of the results, “It’s not a very pleasant thing right now. Some of these people have been here 40 years. Here’s a company that did nothing wrong, paid their federal taxes on time, paid the town on time. The town is going to be a severe loser, and a lot of people here dedicated their life to the company.”

We did it. We did it for the dogs.

Both sides used emotionally-charged advertisements, the anti-racing side showing “sad-eyed greyhounds,” while the pro-racing side highlighted the workers who would be out of work when the tracks close.

Both measures must now come before the Massachusetts Governor’s Council for approval.

A ballot initiative approved by voters in the north-western state of Washington will make it the second state to permit physician-assisted suicide. Initiative 1000 follows the ten-year-old example of the Death With Dignity Act of neighboring Oregon, and will allow physicians to prescribe a lethal dose of medication for a terminally ill patient to administer themselves. It was approved by a margin of 16%, and the ‘Yes’ campaign outspent the ‘No’ campaign by more than three-to-one. The law comes into effect in 2009.

More On This Topic:

byAlma Abell

Millions of Americans are currently dealing with some type of chronic pain. Statistics show that nearly one in every three Americans are dealing with some type of pain at any given time. Back pain is one of the most common types of pain people tend to face. Unfortunately, most of these people turn to drugs in order to relieve their symptoms. The following will hopefully show you why the Center For Manual Medicine might be a better option compared to drugs.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkKAJw7Eh6U[/youtube]

Yes, there are a number of very powerful and very effective drugs out there. Certain pain medications are able to relieve your chronic pain in less than an hour. In addition to being so fast-acting the effects of the medication can last for practically an entire day. These types of drugs are available with a prescription, but many of them are also available over-the-counter.

The problem with these powerful drugs is the fact that they’re only meant to help reduce and relieve the pain. That sharp pain you’ve been feeling in your back will come back once the pain relieving drug wears off. Once the pain returns you’ll be forced to take another pill to make it go away. As you can see, those who opt to use drugs are entering into a cycle that they may not be able to get out of.

Thankfully, there are services for Chiropractic Manhattan KS offers and this is the kind of care more people should get behind. Why? For starters, chiropractic care can be much safer compared to powerful pain relieving drugs. Chiropractors take a hands-on approach to reducing pain. These professionals use a variety of massage and healing techniques in order to get to the root of the problem. Yes, chiropractic care can actually work to cure your chronic pain rather than quiet it momentarily.

The pain management option you choose will be up to you. Again, it’s true that drugs are very effective at relieving pain, but they don’t work to fix your problems. Millions of people have become addicted to certain pain relieving drugs simply because they can’t stand the pain they’re in when the drugs wear off. The Chiropractic Manhattan KS offers will work to safely and effectively reduce your pain. Click here for more details.

BBC to cut Electric Proms for financial reasons

Posted by: in Uncategorized
15
May

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

File:Bbcr2electricpromslogo.jpg

The BBC have announced they are to axe annual music festival Electric Proms from their schedule for financial reasons. The festival first took place in October 2006. The 2011 event will not go ahead, with last year’s festival being the last.

Bob Shennan, controller of BBC Radio 2, said he was “disappointed” with the decision to cancel the festival. He said “In the current climate, we are faced with making difficult decisions, including how best to deliver high-quality live music programming throughout the year in light of continuing efficiency savings. I feel that Radio 2 can achieve the same impact of the Electric Proms in an alternative, more cost-effective way. I’m disappointed that the lifetime of Electric Proms has come to an end, but very proud of its fantastically rewarding run of creating new moments in music for the past five years.”

During the festival’s five year run it has featured performances from stars such as Elton John, Neil Diamond, and Shirley Bassey.

The decision to axe the festival comes at a time when the BBC are planning a 20% savings cut. Last week BBC director general Mark Thompson announced 650 job losses after dropping five languages from the BBC World Service.

Submitted by: Thomas Jones

A mortgage refinance is an unavoidable choice as soon as there are needs that involve extra money. One is restructuring your finances by cashing in equity you can get from the assessed value of your home. This plan assists you make excellent utilization of your refinance even as giving you the best possible advantage of restoring your financial condition.

Young Canadians are renewing their view on financial security. They are fast distinguishing the value of putting their finances in order even as they still have the resources and the physical strength to build their future. Young persons with home mortgages observe the chance presented by a mortgage refinance as a solution to financial breakdown or the option to restore their finances. Regrettably, this is generally an opportunity for a solution of credit card debts. Widespread occurrences of families driven out of their houses due to payment defaults and rising interest rates have turned into nightmare. This ought to caution people who are not careful with their refinance mortgages.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccIE5XRTszk[/youtube]

Ahead of making a decision, look at your choices and be practical on your funding. There is no reason to hurry into it just for the reason that it is accessible. A plan that comprises risks that can emerge at some stage in the loan tenure ought to be part of the groundwork. With a perfect plan in position, borrowers can for sure control their finances and repay their mortgages. An expert financial advisor can be employed to assist you in managing your finances and assist you accomplish your objectives. Having a mortgage refinance is not supposed to cast a shadow on other similarly vital deals for your future and pulling out equity can let you achieve your goals.

Despite the fact that investing money from mortgage refinance is dangerous, On the other hand, several people have used up all of their refinance money without something to prove for it, driving their opportunities away. They are under pressure to repay their loan and assessing one more refinance. This endangers their financial security and risk losing their homes. By means of your second home mortgage, you still have to repay the original mortgage earlier than you sign for a fresh one. Given that you have to pay the same costs as at what time you got your first mortgage, a refinance is just as expensive to obtain and sufficient explanation to make sensible utilization of your mortgage.

Investing your money in your current business is advisable as you won’t need to begin from ground zero. The infusion of extra funds into your business implies you can spread out or improve business and acquire new clients, thus raising profits and overall income. For individuals who have no business venture to talk about so far, a liking towards business chances might be of assistance, however unless you have a fervor for it, your business financed in this way can bring you troubles. Working persons can utilize some of the mortgage refinance cash to purchase stocks, or invest in mutual funds. The road towards financial security will forever be shaky, however with your determination and with some help from an expert financial advisor; you can all the time make it on top.

About the Author: Thomas is an expert in the field. For more information on

Mortgage Rates

, and

Mortgage Refinancing

Please visit: http://www.ratesupermarket.ca/

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=430908&ca=Finances}